本地媒体撰文丨我校教师Jun Wei分享教育者应如何使用ChatGPT

首先，Jun Wei建议一定要设定使用ChatGPT的基本原则，并要求学生显示他们从机器人收到的答案的参考资料。“你可以把人工智能检测当做一种工具，但它们并不总是有效的。相反，就像引用他人作品的引用方式一样，为 ChatGPT 设定类似的基本规则。这个做法的好处还在于要求学生为他们从机器人获得的答案提供参考，以建立信息的可信度。ChatGPT并非100%万无一失，我们还是需要对其输出进行事实检查，“他解释说。这将有助于建立信息的可信度并防止抄袭。

First up, Jun Wei recommends establishing ground rules for using ChatGPT and requiring students to show references for the answers they receive from the bot.

"You could use a countermeasure a.k.a AI detection tool, but they aren’t always effective. Instead, just like how citations are mandated for taking references from others’ works, set similar ground rules for ChatGPT. Better yet, ask students to provide references for the answers they get from the bot to establish the credibility of the information. The platform is not 100-percent foolproof, and still requires users to fact-check its outputs," he explained.

This will help to establish the information's credibility and prevent plagiarism.

Jun Wei还建议在课堂上使用ChatGPT， 让教师进行一些引导，设计一堂有趣且引人入胜的课堂活动，鼓励学生跳出框框探索和思考，找出最佳答案。

“翻转课堂！让学生参与积极的对话。让他们使用 ChatGPT 研究一个新主题并在课堂上讨论它，让他们推动教学做出改变。或者把它变成一个充满乐趣且参与度强的课堂活动 - 让学生进行实验和跳出框框思考，找出他们觉得最好的那个解决方式或答案,"他建议道。

这样做能让更多的学生参与到课堂中来，激发他们学习的兴趣。

Jun Wei also proposes incorporating ChatGPT into a fun and engaging class activity by encouraging students to explore and think outside the box in order to come up with prompts for the greatest answers.

"Flip the classroom! Engage students in active conversation. Ask them to use ChatGPT to research a new topic and discuss it in the classroom and let them drive the teaching for a change. Or turn it into a fun and engaging class activity - get the students to experiment and think outside the box to come up with prompts for the best answers," he suggested.

Doing this, will help contribute to more participatory and collaborative learning.

与常规考试不同，Wei Jun提议，不论是有监考的线下考试或者是让学生带回家完成的作业，教育者们要对这些测试和作业设定更加严格的评分体系。

“对于基本的资格考试，监考测试应该是首选。某些模块也可以带回家的作业，但要有严格的评分体系。ChatGPT 不够“聪明”，无法每次都能产生高质量且事实正确的答案。更严格的评分将促使学生投入工作，以建立超出机器人提供的答案,"他说道。这将有助于确保学生不会完全依赖 ChatGPT 来生成高质量、事实正确的回复。

Instead of conventional exams, Jun Wei advocates supervised tests or take-home tasks with strict marking schemes for exams.

"For essential qualifying exams, supervised tests should be the go-to. Take-home assignments can also be taken for some modules, but with rigid grading schemes. ChatGPT is not 'smart enough' to produce high-quality and factually correct answers every time. Stricter grading will push students to put in the work to build their answers beyond what the bot provides," he revealed.

This will help to ensure that students are not entirely dependent on ChatGPT to generate high-quality, factually correct replies.

最后，Wei June建议尽可能用口试代替笔试。

“在可能的情况下，用口试代替笔试。因此，与其依赖ChatGPT，学生必须利用他们的记忆和理解来得分,”他解释说。他还补充说，这也为学生创造了一个有利的环境，以提高他们的口头沟通技巧。

“归根结底，ChatGPT 只是另一种工具，它让学生为等待他们的世界做好准备。随着它的日益普及，它被每个人、任何地方、同时使用只是时间问题！"

Finally, Jun Wei advises that written tests be replaced with oral tests whenever possible.

"Where possible, replace written tests with oral ones. So rather than relying on ChatGPT, students have to tap into their memory and understanding to score," he explained, adding that this also creates a conducive environment for students to work on their verbal communication skills.

"At the end of the day, ChatGPT is just another tool, which prepares students for the world that awaits them. With its rising popularity, it is only a matter of time till it’s used by everyone, everywhere, all at once!"